Greek Orthodox Patriarchate of Jerusalem, Official Site!
Home2
 

 

Haaretz.com
by the Associated Press
Jerusalem

... Theofilos's invitation addressed him simply as "bishop," Aristarchos said. Irineos I attended the annual party for Christian leaders, said Avi Granot, political adviser to Israel's ceremonial president, Moshe Kastsav.

Reception on Dec. 27, 2006 given by the President of Israel Mr. Moshe Katsav on the occasion of the New Year, for the Heads of the Christian Communities in Israel.
JERUSALEM PATRIARCH IRENAIOS IS INNOCENT OF CHARGES


- January 5 2007: BREAKING NEWS! THE LAWFUL PATRIARCH IRENAIOS OF JERUSALEM IS FOUND INNOCENT!



An independent investigation by the Palestinian Authority has found Patriarch Irenaios *innocent* of the accusations made against him of an alleged "inappropriate" church property sale to a group of Israeli investors. This was used by Patriarch Bartholomew to illegally replace Patriarch Irenaios with his own man, Theophilos III, who was made a Bishop only 3 months before Patriarch Irenaios' dismissal. The Ecumenical Patriarchate stirred up the Sacred Brotherhood of the Holy Sepulchre, inciting some of them against the innocent Patriarch Irenaios so as to have him removed from office. Patriarch Irenaios was not deposed but rather dismissed. Thus he remains the lawful Patriarch of the Jerusalem Patriarchate according to Israeli law.
~ Patriarch Irenaios had fully consented to the wishes of the Palestinian Authority's investigation of the accounting books and transactions. At the same time, the illegally elected new Patriarch Theophilos III would not comply with the investigation. A "Vavylos Phocas," who uses three aliases, and a Mr Papadimos, have been cited as the guilty parties who worked in the Patriarchal accounting office.
It should also be noted that Theophilos III is not recognized by the Israeli Government but Patriarch Irenaios is recognized by them as the lawful Greek Orthodox Patriarch of Jerusalem. The title of the special News Report will be: "Patriarch Irenaios Was Framed! Patriarch Irenaios Is Innocent!" Please do not miss this ground breaking News Report! @ http://sbn-nathanael.livejournal.com/
Article/book #: 21920
Title: PA clears Greek Orthodox patriarch in property deals
By: Associated Press (AP)

Published in: Ha'aretz
Date of issue: Tuesday, 5 July 2005


The embattled Greek Orthodox patriarch in Jerusalem was not involved in the long-term lease of prime Jerusalem properties to Jewish settlement groups in the city, the Palestinian Authority concluded yesterday, after an investigation of several weeks. The findings could signal a turning point in the murky saga of the property deals and help the patriarch, Irineos I, cling to his job.

It was not clear to what extent the findings might have been influenced by the PA's attempt to wrest the properties from Jewish hands. Senior Palestinian officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, have said their main objective was to cancel the property transactions, and that Irineos has been cooperating with them.

The Patriarch of Jerusalem, Irineos I,
is innocent !!!


15/07/2005 HAARETZ.com
Greek's consul general: We're not taking advantage of patriarchy crisis to advance regional presence
By Lily Galili

The Greek consul general in Jerusalem, Eleni Sourani, has denied Israeli claims that Greece is leveraging the crisis at the Greek Orthodox Patriarchy in Jerusalem to advance its political aspirations in the region.
...Sourani rejected claims that the PA removed its support of the patriarch due to Greek pressure. "Had the Palestinians wanted to appease us, they would have revoked their recognition long ago," she said.

"The PA decided to revoke recognition at the timing of its choice, and as far as I know, it was recommended by the committee set up to examine the affair. The committee's report is very different from the position of Irineos' Palestinian lawyers, clearing him of all involvement in the real estate deal," she said.

Eleni Sourani
Greek consul general
in
Jerusalem

The statement issued by Dr Emil Jarjoui

Dr. Emil Jarjoui is the head of the Palestinian Ministerial Investigation Commission for the deal of Jaffa Gate, member of the Executive Committee of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), and member of the Palestinian Legislative Council.

There is also no need for anyone to hide behind the Palestinian recognition, as there are the hidden considerations and embarrassments between the countries and governments, including pressures, which are not in the sake of anyone to reveal or look into its details. The weeks and days to come might carry other news form Jordan and Palestine based on the findings of the inquiry commission about Jaffa Gate deal and based on not executing the pledges.

In Jordan, there is a case in court carried out by past justice minister and ex president of the Supreme Court, Fahed Abu el Atham, criticizing Jordan’s recognition of Theophilus...
...The Nazareth council had to sign, for legal reasons and upon lawyers’ advice, a statement that asks not to recognize Theophilus as a patriarch...
read more

Facts revealed by the investigation commission

The investigation commission led a professional, honest and objective investigation, by meeting and investigating with 20 people in relation with the Patriarchate, including bishops, institutions, companies, banks, governmental bureaus and lawyers’ offices, and examined a large number of testimonials and documents. The commission has adopted more than one source of information and issued a report of 50 pages composed of 13 chapters with annexes and letters. Although it has been a year since that report has been issued, no official or public authorities, here or elsewhere, have protested nor denied any of its documents or even made an attempt to prove untrue. Even those people named in the report and accused of criminal violations, betrayal, robbery and fraud, did not protest.
What are the basic facts that the inquiry commission came with?

There is no evidence to convict Irineos of Jaffa Gate deal. He is not involved in it and had no knowledge about it neither while it was prepared, taking place nor while signing it, he also did not participate in it, did not benefit from it and did not authorize anyone to make it neither earlier nor later. Therefore it was not presented to the Synod for validation according to the Patriarchate’s laws, so it is void and illegal.

It was Papadimas, the church financial officer, who signed the deal, taking advantage of an authorization granted to him to accomplish a house rent. Later on, Papadimas disappeared, embezzled money from the Patriarchate funds and fled away. He is now a suspect, he keeps important relations with clergy in the Patriarchate, other right wing and settlement Israeli parties, and information and governmental services. He was employed in the Patriarchate under pressure from the Greek Military Attaché in Tel Aviv embassy. Irineos was a victim to a dangerous conspiracy “yes a major and dangerous conspiracy”, to dismiss him, in concert with some of the Patriarchate’s employees, Synod members...Read More

Article/book #: 24741
Title: Greek Orthodox Church sets bizarre patriarch precedent
By: Lily Galili
Published in: Ha'aretz
Date of issue: Sunday, 21 August 2005

Barring any last-minute changes, as of tomorrow morning Jerusalem's Greek Orthodox Church will have two patriarchs: Irineos the First, who is recognized only by Israel, and a new patriarch recognized by most of the Orthodox world, and by Jordan and the Palestinian Authority.

This bizarre state of affairs presents a problem for the Greek Orthodox Church, but more of a problem for Israel, which is on a collision course with the Orthodox world. Israel's stubborn position has provoked harsh criticism from the Greek government, which is embarrassed by the affair and seeks to end it quickly.

Dr. Peter Qumri discloses and documents:
The truth and background of the conspiracy to remove Irineos, and the reality of Theophilus and the corrupts controlling the inside of the Patriarchate.

Dr. Peter Qumri is a Palestinian public figure, well known for his interest in the Arab Orthodox issue, the Patriarchate and the happenings in.
Former Deputy Foreign Minister Panagiotis Skandalakis stated that the decisions of the Panorthodox Meeting have to be accepted by everone, noting, "Whoever deviates or does not conform will bear the responsibility of any negative developments"

He had a significant role in the establishment and leadership of a number of boards of trustees and other Orthodox committees, the founder of Orthodox youth movements and Sunday schools, holder of the Holy Sepulcher medal of the “high commander” rank, which is the highest medal a layman can have.

Al Quds newspaper published a long interview with Dr. Qumri concerning this issue on 13.04.06. Then in June 2006 he sent a long letter to Metropolitan Theophilus, making it also an open letter to the congregation and whoever is concerned.
What follows is a summary of the positions and primary information that appeared in the long interview and letter:

...I was among the first who called to withdraw the confidence from the Patriarch Irineos. And I say frankly with a living conscience: Now I condemn myself for my hastiness and I apologize for my rashness, since what accompanied the news was a major revolution that no one could stand in its way. Then this revolution acted under the influences, internal and external, on both levels, of the Church and of the relation between the Church and the members of the Arab congregation.

History will write about these facts in the future, and I say honestly that it was a conspiracy by the Greek government, in the person of Skandalakis, the deputy foreign minister who was fired two months ago from his office, when the Greek government discovered the extent of his conspiracy against the Patriarchate and the situation of schism to which it led. This is added to the plot of the Oecumenical Patriarch Bartholomeo in Constintinople against the Jerusalem Patriarchate. The reason for this plot was that the Greek deputy foreign minister had held for himself an amount of 4 millions dollars from the rent of a piece of land owned by the Patriarchate in Greece willing to transfer it to an Olympic village at the last Olympic games held in Athens in 2004. Irineos was against the corruption and bribery that accompanied this deal and he warned to go the courts to annul it.

....I don’t support Patriarch Irineos, but I support the right. There is nothing more hurting than to feel the injustice done to others. Every conscientious man is asked to stand with the right and to lift the oppression. Patriarch Irineos has the right now to hold the throne and the spiritual leadership, since he was elected democratically. Read More
Article/book #: 37261
Title: Hanegbi confirms Israel's support of ousted Greek Patriarch Irineos
By: Lily Galili
Published in: Ha'aretz
Date of issue: Monday, 24 April 2006

 


Israel Recognizes Patriarch Irineos I
Israel Foreign Minister Tzachi Hanecbi

   
For the first time since Irineos I was ousted from his post by the Greek Orthodox Church, the government has formally confirmed its continued recognition of him as patriarch of Jerusalem despite the appointment of a successor, Theofilos III. This was conveyed in a letter sent to Irineos by Minister Tzachi Hanegbi, the chairman of a ministerial committee created to deal with issues surrounding the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate. The letter was sent following yesterday's "holy fire" ceremony at the Church of the Holy Sepulcher.
Holy Fire, (Patriarch Irineos I)

A summary of the open letter sent by Dr. Peter Qumri to Theophilus and the congregation
The current Holy Synod, Your Eminence Metropolitan Theophilus, is not legitimate due to the fact that eight of its eighteen members do not satisfy the membership requirements. The law states that the Synod member should have acquired the Jordanian nationality and passport, those eight did not. In addition, the previous Synod (2001-2005) that named you a patriarch, is also a Synod that lacks legitimacy since two of the fourteen members do not have the Jordanian nationality. This applies after withdrawing the membership of three out the seventeen members, in an illegitimate session, because they insisted on supporting Irineos as patriarch as none of the accusations was validated.

Theophilus


Your election by an illegitimate Synod does not confer on you anything but illegitimacy for the post that was given to you untruly. The legitimate Patriarch is still alive, and the way he was deposed is illegal and full of conspiracy between the inside of the Patriarchate and its outside. There is no Synod session to which the Patriarch himself calls and then it ends by deposing him. The conditions for deposition according to both the Church canon law and civil law are heresy and mental disorder. The mechanism to depose the Patriarch Irineos employed telephone calls, authorizations and signatures at homes, away from all legal regulations and formulations. In addition, the general secretary of the Patriarchate compelled all archimandrites and monks of the holy Sepulcher Brotherhood to sign on the memorandum to denounce Patriarch Irineos, support his deposal and the election of a new patriarch to replace him (we have a copy of the letter). He also threatened them with depriving them of their passports, annulling their residence permits, removing them from the Brotherhood and expulsing them to Greece. Based on that, all the articles of administrative assignments or deposition from the Synod, and the aforementioned memorandum put all who are behind them in a position of legal responsibility for threatening and blackmailing.

You might say that the Greek government recognized you. This is an unacceptable statement and we must answer that the Greek government has its own church in Greece. This church participated in working against the Patriarch Irineos in order to settle some accounts with him. At that time, I was one of the swindled.

As for accusing Irineos with the Jaffa Gate deal, I believed that, until I found the truth and put my finger on the wound. The folks revolted when the news about the deal was spread by Maariv newspaper, the instigators and ill wishers, from inside the Patriarchate and its outside, hurried to undertake the fictitious news and end the situation to what it is now.

Our question addressed to your eminence, Metropolitan Theophilus, is: why didn’t you bring a claim against Papadimas (who performed the Jaffa Gate deal and stole money from the Patriarchate and ran away) and request him to give his testimony in order to clear the issues? We suppose you know his current address in Canada, since he calls your nearest metropolitan on a daily basis. Isn’t it necessary to bring him, even through the Interpol, first to record his witness, and to retrieve the money he stole from the account, opened by the owners of fictitious companies, where they deposited part of what they agreed upon with Papadimas and some others involved in the conspiracy inside the Patriarchate, without the Patriarch’s knowledge?

In order to demonstrate the broadness of the conspiracy and the involvement of some people from the Patriarchate, I inform your eminence that I received a telephone call on the evening of Thursday 17/3/2005 from an unknown who speaks Arabic incorrectly and with an accent. He said without introduction: “Doctor, listen tomorrow morning, at the Radio of Jerusalem Al Quds, for what the newspapers will be writing about a bomb…”

I thought, for the first instant, that the speaker is Jew, but after listening to the newspapers headings on the next day (morning of Friday 18/3/2005, the day when Maariv disclosed the news about Jaffa Gate deal), I started to doubt that the speaker was Greek, not a Jew, and from inside the Patriarchate. What assured me is that one of the bishops, we knew it later, called on the same day, Thursday 17/3/2005, one of his friends named Samir (we keep his family name), asking him to listen on the next day to the newspapers heading program on the Israeli station. What does that mean, reverend fathers? Doesn’t it mean that one of the dimensions of the plot on his beatitude Patriarch Irineos is inside the Patriarchate, among those whose interests overlapped with the goals of those involved, from outside the Patriarchate, who have their own agendas and desires in settling, with the patriarch, their own election and status accounts? Read more

Chasing the Patriarch

The support of the Greek clerics in the Patriarchate remained, despite what was published by Ma’ariv and despite the outcry and the Arab protest and condemnation following the publication.

Key Synod members continued to defend the Patriarch and denied any involvement by him in the deal.

They augmented their support and backing of the Patriarch with a petition signed by 55 priests, archimandrites and bishops. They forwarded the petition to the Greek Prime Minister, demanding action or intervention against some clerics who incited against the Patriarch and inflamed tempers against him.
The leaders of the instigators met on May 4, 2005 to organize the mutiny. They decided to prepare a petition containing their demands for the removal and boycotting the Patriarch.

At first, the petition was signed by the opposition.

Later, they approached the priests, monks and the bishops who supported the Patriarch and pressured them to sign it. (The Palestinian Commission)

The Palestinian Commission, To probe the facts and realities of the so-called Baab Al-Khalil and the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate


Introduction

On March 19, 2005 the Palestinian Cabinet decided to set up a fact-finding special committee to investigate a report published by Ma’ariv regarding a deal to sell property belonging to Greek Orthodox Patriarchate in Jerusalem. The aforementioned property is located in the court of Omar Bin el Khattab inside the Old City of Jerusalem. This property included the Imperial Hotel and the building of Petra Hotel. The Committee was charged with the task of verifying the authenticity of the report, and to collect as many realities, facts and information as it could relevant to the issue. The Committee would then put forward a full picture of what had happened as well as its recommendation as to the necessary procedures that should be taken to stop the deal, cancel it and declare it null and void.

This report contains the gist of verified realities leading to the outcome we have reached at. Some of these results are supported by documents and others are supported by testimonies of eyewitnesses.

Background

Ireneos' path was not paved with roses when he assumed the leadership of the Patriarchate. From the beginning of his election to the post as Patriarch of the Holy City, he found himself engulfed with strong and shrewd opposition and contenders having close contacts with countries, officials and strong politicians in Israel, Jordan, Greece and Russia, etc.

His predecessor or those around him left him an empty coffer and treasury and passed on to him debts and dues estimated about NIS 85 million. Sources of revenue were scarce and there were several pending cases before courts, distributed among several law firms.

The property files were not in order. They were not in their proper place at the Patriarchate’s Treasury Department. As well as the files of the deals which were arranged, edited, signed and endorsed by his predecessors. These were not in the offices of the Patriarchate, but they were distributed and kept at the offices of the lawyers who handled them. In view of all the above, he was unable to see what his predecessors have done or what they have left him. That was still in need of handling and follow-up, and to apprise himself of what was going on.

Employment of Papadimas

In the summer of 2002 or around it, the military attaché at the Greek Embassy in Tel Aviv visited Bishop Kyriakos, Bishop of Nazareth. He was accompanied by a young man named Nicolas Papadimas, a Greek from Ioannina, living in Tel Aviv and married to an Israeli new immigrant from Russia. The attaché claimed that Papadimas had applied for a job at the embassy, but the embassy turned him down for lack of a vacancy.

The attaché requested Bishop Kyriakos help Papadimas, being a Greek, get a job at the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate in Jerusalem. He showed his desire in finding him a job. Bishop Kyriakos agreed to recommend Papadimas to the Patriarch. In fact, an appointment was made with the Patriarch whom he visited with Papadimas. He suggested to the Patriarch to employ Papadimas, explaining that the Greek Embassy was keen on finding him a job.

The Patriarch approved of the recommendation, and assigned Papadimas to the post of accountant in the Patriarchate’s Financial Department.

None of those around the Patriarch demonstrated or filed an objection or any remark concerning the employment of Papadimas at any time until his escape. None of the officials or advisors around the Patriarch has ever mentioned any flaw in the performance of Papadimas. Not even a remark was made concerning his performance or his way of managing the funds of the Patriarchate or any remark concerning the persons he met and dealt with.

The Escape of Papadimas

In November 2004, various incidents aroused fears of the Patriarch towards Papadimas. During October and early November 2004, Papadimas tried to convince the Patriarch of the need to accept some of the property offers presented to the Patriarch’s advocate, in order to remedy the deteriorating financial situation at the Patriarchate, and to cover some of the debts and expenses, and pay the overdue salaries. The Patriarch declined all these offers and rejected every possible settlement. Instead, he insisted on approaching the Greek Government for financial help. Against this background, several verbal altercations took place between the Patriarch and Papadimas. Some of these altercations were in the presence of eye witnesses.

One day in November 2004, i.e., ten days before the escape of Papadimas, and while the Patriarch was on his way back to Jerusalem from Tel-Aviv together with a priest in his car, an anonymous car rammed the Patriarch’s car and fled the scene. The Patriarch suspected it was an attempt on his life. A few days later, the Greek Foreign Ministry called the Patriarch and notified him that the wife of Papadimas was arrested while entering Greece. She was carrying 120.000 Euros and various jewelries. The Ministry enquired if her husband was actually working for the Patriarchate. The Foreign Ministry instructed the Patriarch to seal the treasury and deny Papadimas any access to it. He complied.

Papadimas disappeared during this period. Four days prior to his escape he resorted to an Israeli friend of his and asked him to find him a refuge, under the pretext that settlers were chasing him following his failure to complete a property deal with them. When he failed {to find refuge} he fled the country. Two days later the Patriarch knew about his escape to an unknown place. Upon knowing that, the Patriarch initiated an internal investigation. He also lodged a complaint with the Greek authorities against Papadimas. He demanded that they arrest him and put him to trial for embezzlement of money from the Patriarchate.

On October 19, 2004 Papadimas withdrew $150,000 US dollars in cash. He also withdrew another $150,000 US dollars on November 2, 2004. There were also withdrawals in Israeli currency from this account to unknown quarters.

We were not able yet to receive all the relevant account sheets. We didn't receive yet copies of the payment transfers and vouchers of payment at the bank.

Fourth: On October 19, 2004, Papadimas, acting on behalf of the patriarch, signed a lease contract for real estate plot No 45 lot 30859 including the house built on it in Al-Mo'athamiyya Str. No. 18, Bab Hutta- Old City.

The lease duration is 99 years for the amount of $55,000 US dollars in three payments, the first installment $10,000 US dollars to be paid within 30 days, the second payment for $15,000 US dollars to be paid on January 1, 2005, the third for $15,000 US dollars to be paid on February 1, 2005.

The fourth payment for $15,000 US dollars was to be paid on March 1, 2005.

These payments were supposed to be transferred to the said Bank Leumi account. But there was no mention of these amounts in the accounts we received, bearing in mind that despite our request to the bank, it didn't deliver them to us.

It is worth mentioning that this Bank Account was closed as of the end of February 2005.

Papadimas was authorized to sign for the said account as well as for all the Patriarchate's accounts at the banks, in the capacity of the position he held at the time.

We could not find in the documents which we received and reviewed, any signature or any evidence indicating that the Patriarch received any amount of the transferred payments. In addition, the buyers' lawyer acknowledges that he did not remit any amount to the Patriarch.

Conclusion

1. In accordance with the information and data we received, we have not heard or received any evidence or proof, incriminating Patriarch Ireneos of knowing about a deal before its being signed or during the signing of and until the flight of Papadimas from the country.

2. He did not participate in the proceedings at any stage.

3. He did not receive any amount from any deal, despite the fact that all the payments were made to the account of the Patriarchate.

4. The deals were never presented to the Synod of the Holy Tomb Brotherhood, because the Patriarch was not aware of them.

Therefore the Synod did not endorse them, a matter which renders these deals legally invalid so they remain incomplete. Read More

NEOI ANTHROPOI newspaper, Athens. 10-11-2006 , JERUSALEM: The lie never hides the Truth!

It’s a difficult time for . . . diplomats. The news that is coming from Jerusalem is not pleasant at all for the “illuminators” of the Foreign Ministry, who worked with special zeal in order to guide our Patriarchate to today’s tragic dead end.
The Israelis, to their credit, don’t accept to follow downhill to illegality and to “dress” with the cape of legality the acts and the works of a lamentable group of Greek clergymen, which following the instructions of Greek diplomats, abolished everything legal and ethical. The “forecasts” of the “specialists” of the foreign ministry, that “sooner or later Israel will give in”, were shown to be ridiculous and dangerous for our ethnic rights in the Holy Lands. In this way, embarrassed and ridiculed, they try in the Foreign Ministry, to buy time, hoping for . . . a miracle!
.....No, His Beatitude Irineos has not yet been “thrown out” of Israel as the “fortune-tellers” of the Foreign Ministry were predicting from the 19th of July, 2006! Full Article

(THE COMMITTEE FOR THE RESTORATION OF LEGALITY IN THE PATRIARCHATE OF JERUSALEM).




 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2006. Greek Orthodox Patriarchate of Jerusalem. All Rights Reserved